Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Walter Chruby v. Annette Kowaleski, et al
as 12-3132
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER A. CHRUBY
Defendant - Appellee:
ANNETTE KOWALESKI, in her official and personal capacities, MARGE LECHENE, in her official and personal capacities, MIKE PIOVARCHY, RNS, in his official and personal capacities and others
SMALL, et al v. WETZEL, et al
as 3:2012cv00083
Plaintiff:
PEARLIE DUBOSE, JR. and ELWOOD SMALL
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL , LIEUTENANT CONTI , HARRY MAUST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Edward Hummel v. David Pitkins, et al
as 12-1891
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD V. HUMMEL
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID PITKINS, Superintendent, Laurel Highlands, Somerset, Pennsylvania and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Edward Klinger v. David Pitkins, et al
as 11-4538
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD F. KLINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID PITKINS, DA NORTHAMPTON and ATTY GEN PA
HUMMEL v. PITKINS et al
as 3:2011cv00279
Petitioner:
EDWARD VINCENT HUMMEL
Respondent:
DAVID PITKINS and LINDA L. KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Romont Jones v. David Pitkins, et al
as 11-3935
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROMONT ALVIN JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID PITKINS, DA LANCASTER and ATTY GEN PA
CHRUBY v. KOWALESKI, et al
as 3:2011cv00225
Plaintiff:
WALTER CHRUBY
Defendant:
ANNETTE KOWALESKI , MARGE LECHENE , RNS MICHAEL PIOVARCHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DuBose et al v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2011cv01819
Plaintiff:
Pearlie DuBose, Jr. and Elwood Small
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Lieutenant Conti, Harry Maust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shawn Livingston v. David Pitkins, et al
as 11-2558
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN DAVID LIVINGSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID PITKINS and ATTY GEN PA
HAYES v. CROYLE et al
as 3:2011cv00100
Plaintiff:
GEORGE HAYES
Defendant:
BRADLEY CROYLE, ANJANEYULU KARUMUDL, DAVID PITKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
