Cases 21 - 30 of 765
C.J. v. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
C. J.
Defendant:
David Jones, Matthew Currence and Robert Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
David M. Allen
Defendant:
Acting Warden S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Garcia v. LeFever
as 1:2022cv00590
Petitioner:
David Perez Garcia
Respondent:
Warden M. LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Allen v. Brown
as 5:2022cv00546
Plaintiff:
David M. Allen
Defendant:
S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Friend v. Tanzail
as 2:2022cv00468
Plaintiff:
John David Friend
Defendant:
Ritchie Jameel Tanzail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2022cv00467
Plaintiff:
Cody Graham
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Johnny Wilson, CO II David Ewing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
A.D. v. Demetro et al
as 2:2022cv00432
Plaintiff:
A. D.
Defendant:
Anthony Demetro, David Jones, Matthew Currence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Friend v. Southwestern Regional Jail
as 2:2022cv00414
Plaintiff:
John David Friend
Defendant:
Southwestern Regional Jail
Respondent:
Administrator of the Southwestern Regional Jail and Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Clinton v. Groh et al
as 5:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Gregory K. Clinton
Defendant:
Gina M. Groh, Robert W. Trumble, Anna Krasinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Troutman v. Wolfe
as 5:2022cv00228
Petitioner:
David S. Troutman
Respondent:
Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
