Cases 21 - 30 of 128
Diaz v. Briggs et al
as 1:2021cv01085
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Warden Gregory Briggs
Petitioner:
Eric Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lane v. Hartman et al
as 3:2021cv00401
Defendant:
Barry Karwowski, Harold Kertes, John Battenberg and others
Plaintiff:
James T. Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIAZ v. OBERLANDER et al
as 1:2021cv00044
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDANT MICHAEL OVERMYER, PA. DOC. DEREK F. OBERLANDER, UNIT SGT. MAHONEY and others
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES S. DIAZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DIAZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 4:2020cv01667
Petitioner:
HAMETT DIAZ
Respondent:
PA Attorney General and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DIAZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2020cv03987
Petitioner:
HAMETT DIAZ
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DIAZ v. OBERLANDER et al
as 1:2020cv00222
Petitioner:
DOMINIC SOUTO DIAZ
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ERIE and OBERLANDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Riley v. Diaz et al
as 1:2020cv01100
Defendant:
Mahanoy Prison, Practioner Gusitutt, John Wetzel and others
Plaintiff:
Warren J. Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REMICK et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv01959
Plaintiff:
NADIYAH WALKER, MICHAEL ALEJANDRO, ROBERT HINTON and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMISSIONER BLANCHE CARNEY and BLANCHE CARNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DIAZ v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2020cv00873
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, MARK CAPOZZA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
BRIAN DIAZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Glenn v. Mataloni et al
as 1:2020cv00069
Defendant:
M.D. Stanley Stanish, Renato Diaz, Prison Health Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone K. Glenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
