Cases 21 - 30 of 214
Williams #124345 v. Yuma, County of
as 2:2022cv01120
Plaintiff:
DaJuan Torrell Williams
Defendant:
Yuma, County of, Leon N Wilmot, Robert Arriola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Esquivel v. Comal County
as 5:2022cv00448
Plaintiff:
Francisco Esquivel, III
Defendant:
Comal County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Esquivel v. Comal County
as 5:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
Francisco Esquivel, III
Defendant:
Comal County and FNU Mora
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parnell v. Collier - TDCJ Director et al
as 5:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Buddy T Parnell
Defendant:
Bryan Collier - TDCJ Director, Ronald Ivey, Clayton Straughan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Todd Ashker, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 22-15345
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TODD LEWIS ASHKER, DANNY TROXELL, GEORGE RUIZ and others
Defendant / Appellant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor of the State of California, MATTHEW CATE, ANTHONY CHAUS, Chief, Office of Correctional Safety, CDCR and others
Grizzle v. Mcintire et al
as 5:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Robert Grizzle
Defendant:
Bryson Mcintire, Madison Hendricks, Lindsay Hummel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams #124345 v. Yuma, County of et al
as 2:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
DaJuan Torrell Williams
Defendant:
Yuma, County of, Bianca Acosta, Julian Aguayo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Esquivel v. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv04248
Petitioner:
Jesus Antonio Esquivel
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Esquivel v. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv04001
Petitioner:
Jesus Esquivel
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Esquivel v. Warden, FMC Carswell
as 2:2021cv00042
Petitioner:
Raquel Esquivel
Respondent:
Michael Carvajal and Warden, FMC Carswell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
