Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Tuck v. Angliss et al
as 1:2017cv06218
Plaintiff:
William Tuck, Jr.
Defendant:
Stephanie, Sainsbury, Angliss, Gregg A. Garofalo, Rebekah L Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Fatima Ransom
as 16-11619
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FATIMA RANSOM
Ransom v. USA
as 4:2016cv00738
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Fatima Ransom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McCree v. Karim et al
as 1:2015cv10570
Plaintiff:
Rafael McCree
Defendant:
Fatima Karim, Thomas M. Giusto, Stacie E. Kepmton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv01005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Saeed Hatim, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 13-5218
Petitioner - Appellee:
Saeed Mohammed Saleh Hatim, Detainee, Camp Delta, Ali Mohammed Saleh Al-Salahi, as next friend of Saeed Mohammed Saleh Hatim, Mohammed Nasser Yahia Abdullah Khussrof, Detainee, Camp Delta and others
Respondent - Appellant:
Barack Obama, Chuck Hagel, Secretary, U. S. Department of Defense, Richard W. Butler, Rear Admiral, Commander, Joint Task Force-GTMO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00647
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lo v. New Jersey Immigration Court et al
as 3:2013cv00648
Petitioner:
Fatima Bineta Lo
Respondent:
New Jersey Immigration Court and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darwich et al v. US Department of Justice et al
as 2:2013cv10757
Plaintiff:
Ali Darwich and Fatima Houssein Toufaili
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, Ronald W Waterstreet, Eli Sassine and others
Fatima Shatat v. USA
as 12-12029
Petitioner - Appellant:
FATIMA SHATAT
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
