Cases 21 - 30 of 178
Kelly v. Davis
as 5:2019cv00125
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Travis Kelly
Defendant:
Sheriff Frank Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Shaw
as 2:2019cv00150
Defendant:
Frank Shaw
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Davis
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Shaw
as 3:2019cv00543
Defendant:
Frank Shaw
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Roger Cal Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shelton v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2019cv00491
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Respondent:
State of Mississippi and EMCF Warden Frank Shaw
Petitioner:
Gregory T. Shelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Frank v. Paul
as 3:2019cv00484
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Paul and Warden Paul
Plaintiff:
Kent Frank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Holloway v. Shaw et al
as 3:2019cv00370
Defendant:
Warden Frank Shaw, John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100 and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jason Holloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Ladner et al
as 3:2019cv00243
Defendant:
James Fillyaw, William Moody, Deputy Warden Vivian Frazier and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinley v. Lampley et al
as 1:2019cv00174
Defendant:
Deputy Warden K. Blount, Pamela C. Robinson, Pelisha Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Frank McKinley
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Shaw et al
as 3:2019cv00023
Defendant:
Mary Ann Jones, Charlis Dukes, Ruth Saucier and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Reeves v. Shaw
as 1:2019cv00029
Defendant:
Frank Shaw
Plaintiff:
Edmond Denton Reeves
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
