Cases 21 - 30 of 39
GRAHAM v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2019cv00851
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, ALEYCIA MCCULLOUGH, MICHELLE LAFLOWER and others
Plaintiff:
ROGER GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. BRANCHVILLE CORRECTION FACILITY
as 3:2019cv00036
Respondent:
BRANCHVILLE CORRECTION FACILITY
Petitioner:
GREGORY GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PERRY v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2019cv00253
Defendant:
PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JONATHAN REED, Individually and in his Official Capacity, MATTHEW FRANKLIN, Individually and in his Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE PERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MERCADO v. PARKS et al
as 1:2018cv02598
Plaintiff:
ANGELITO C. MERCADO and ANGELITO MERCADO
Defendant:
CHIPPER PARKS and GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. KRUEGER et al
as 2:2018cv00276
Defendant:
J. BRADLEY, J. E. KRUEGER, MCCOY and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERRY v. HINSHAW et al
as 1:2018cv00611
Defendant:
MRS. FRANKLIN, SGT. GRAHAM, VEDORA HINSHAW and others
Plaintiff:
RODNEY S. PERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. LUNSFORD et al
as 1:2017cv04150
Defendant:
D. DAVIS, BROOKE EDWARDS, M. ENGLISH and others
Plaintiff:
AARON SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. PERRAULT et al
as 1:2017cv03521
Defendant:
R. COUNSELOR, D. DAVIS, BROOKE EDWARDS and others
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
AARON SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GAINES v. CORIZON HEALTH et al
as 2:2016cv00243
Defendant:
CONNIE ALLEN, FINOTE ASFAW, BRYAN BULLER and others
Plaintiff:
DEANGELO GAINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Restricted Filer v. Roberts et al
as 1:2016cv00208
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Richard W Roberts, Henry H Kennedy, Rosemary M Collyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
