Cases 21 - 30 of 97
RUDOLPH v. WELLPATH et al
as 3:2022cv00038
Defendant:
WELLPATH, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, MD RAJINDER MALHI and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC RUDOLPH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
COYLE v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2021cv04704
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL COYLE
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA, MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, PRIMECARE MEDICAL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. CROOKUS et al
as 2:2021cv04615
Plaintiff:
KEEGAN GABRIEL BAKER
Defendant:
CO' CROOKUS, CO' STRAWTHER, SGT. STEWART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON et al v. CLAYHURST et al
as 2:2021cv04156
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON, LESSIE POWELL, RASHID POWELL and others
Defendant:
HAROLD CLAYHURST, JILL BRADY, GORDON GALLAGHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON et al v. LEHIGH COUNTY PRISON et al
as 5:2021cv03620
Plaintiff:
DONTAIE ANDERSON, JAWON H. JOHNSON, KAMAR THOMPSON and others
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY PRISON, KYLE RUSSEL, JANINE DONATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2021cv03353
Petitioner:
GABRIEL MARTIN LOPEZ
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SALVADOR-RODRIGUEZ v. JONES et al
as 2:2021cv00757
Defendant:
C/O JONES and C/O FERGUSON
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL SALVADOR-RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PITTMAN v. SMITH
as 3:2021cv00083
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH
Petitioner:
GABRIEL ISHAM PITTMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gabriel v. ICE et al
as 1:2021cv00132
Defendant:
Megan Foote Monsky, Chad Wolf, ICE and others
Plaintiff:
Jocelyn Gabriel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREENIDGE v. LEHNOWSKY et al
as 2:2020cv06476
Defendant:
WELLPATH, LLC, MANFREY, STEPHEN WIENER and others
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL GREENIDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
