Cases 21 - 30 of 103
HOLMES v. OBERLANDER et al
as 2:2021cv04115
Petitioner:
JOSEPH HOLMES
Respondent:
D.B. OBERLANDER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOLMES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv01386
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HOLMES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HOLMES v. VEITH et al
as 2:2019cv01398
Defendant:
KARA MARIE SIDONE, ORLANDO HARPER, MICHAEL P. VEITH and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HOLMES v. VEITH et al
as 2:2019cv04794
Defendant:
KARA MARIE SIDONE, WARDEN: ORLANDO HARPER, MICHAEL P. VEITH and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
as 2:2019cv04226
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
Plaintiff:
DAVID DEMETREIUS HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2019cv03231
Defendant:
DAVID WRIGHT, SIMON THOMPSON SEMONE and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
KEITH HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES v. GARMAN et al
as 5:2019cv02854
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, MARK GARMAN and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LEHIGH COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
DUANE MARCEL HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOLMES v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
as 2:2019cv00040
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
Plaintiff:
DAVID DEMETRIUS HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. PA Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv01150
Plaintiff:
Aaron A. Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
PA Dept of Corrections, Correct Care Solutions , William Dreibelbus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CRUZ v. CUNNINGHAM et al
as 1:2018cv00052
Plaintiff:
JAMIE CRUZ, SR.
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. CUNNINGHAM, ELIZABETH HIRZ, PAUL BIZZARRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
