Cases 21 - 30 of 168
SMITH v. WEDDELL
as 1:2023cv00989
Plaintiff:
JOHN D. SMITH, II
Defendant:
BRANDON WEDDELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. HAMBLEN et al
as 1:2023cv00930
Plaintiff:
JOHN D. SMITH, II
Defendant:
LISA HAMBLEN, ARYANNA MOSS, LAURA YOUNGSTAFEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. REAGLE
as 1:2023cv00906
Petitioner:
JOHN D. SMITH, II
Respondent:
DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tharpe v. Kathy
as 3:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Tharpe, II
Defendant:
Kathy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARROLL v. DELAWARE COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
LARRY D. CARROLL, II
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY JAIL, TONY SKINNER, A. SHIELDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOUYE JR v. SWEENEY II et al
as 1:2023cv00415
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD DEAN BOUYE JR
Defendant:
JAMES R. SWEENEY II, KATHERINE A. CORNELIUS and J. NIEDERHELMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VELEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00141
Petitioner:
ORLANDO ELISEO VELEZ, II
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
REYNOLDS v. BYRD et al
as 1:2022cv02152
Plaintiff:
STEVEN REYNOLDS
Defendant:
SAMUEL J. BYRD, KIM HOBSON, JOHN DOE, I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bigley v. Gladieux
as 1:2022cv00311
Plaintiff:
David L. Bigley, II
Defendant:
David J Gladieux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcus v. Kuiper et al
as 3:2022cv00705
Plaintiff:
Matthew Marcus, II
Defendant:
Joshua Kuiper, James Jackson, Wexford of Indiana LLC and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
