Cases 21 - 30 of 101
Hail et al v. Scott et al
as 6:2021cv00378
Defendant:
Jamie Alvarez, MD., B. E. Uebele, IV, A. Moody and others
Plaintiff:
C. Hail Debond, P. K. Hail Smith, Jayson Hail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv00134
Respondent:
CHELLIE BAKER, NORWOOD, J. Jackson and others
Petitioner:
Amon Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDS v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2021cv00058
Defendant:
NORWOOD, DEBRA A UELLENBERG, J JACKSON and others
Plaintiff:
AMON DEAN RICHARDS and AMON RICHARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuentes v. Inspector General et al
as 3:2021cv00101
Defendant:
Gilt, United States District Court Middle District of Florida and Inspector General
Plaintiff:
Yoandris Rosales Fuentes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNEED v. INCH et al
as 4:2020cv00534
Defendant:
BUREAU OF ADMISSION AND RELEASE, STACEY HAYNES, JOHN AND JANE DOES and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY SNEED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHESTNUT v. SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 3:2020cv05918
Plaintiff:
GERNARD D CHESTNUT
Defendant:
WARDEN SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, DICE, SECRETARY OF DOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2020cv81761
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Gordon et al v. Williams et al
as 3:2020cv01091
Defendant:
Mark Mahon, Ronnie Fussell, Attorney General William Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua L Gordon and Jahmal C. Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAGHUBIR V. WARDEN CROSS CITY CI ET AL
as 1:2020cv00227
Defendant:
TAYLOR CI, FDLE, TAYLOR COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raghubir v. Warden Cross City CI et al
as 6:2020cv01655
Defendant:
F.D.L.E., Medical Staff D.O.C., D.O.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Vinodh Raghubir
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
