Cases 21 - 30 of 1,229
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harbour v. Cryer et al
as 5:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Trenece L Harbour
Defendant:
John Cryer, Marshall Woodward, Bud Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cowart v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
John Cowart
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Guevara v. Keyes (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Guevara
Defendant:
R. D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Council v. Hamm et al
as 2:2023cv00730
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Council and Kinetik Justice
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, John Hamm, Cheryl Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holifield v. Hamm et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00729
Plaintiff:
Eric Lamar Holifield
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Cheryl Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Council et al v. Ivey et al
as 2:2023cv00712
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Council, Kinetik Justice, Lee Edward Moore, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall, Leigh Gwathney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steward v. Crow
as 4:2023cv01673
Petitioner:
Randy Andrial Steward
Respondent:
John Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rives v. Hamm et al
as 4:2023cv01659
Petitioner:
Walter Richard Rives
Respondent:
John Q. Hamm, Phillip Mitchell and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv01617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
