Cases 21 - 30 of 35
CLARK v. LAYTON et al
as 1:2017cv00737
Plaintiff:
ALLEN CLARK
Defendant:
ERIC HIGGINSON and JOHN LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMLET v. COMMISSIONER et al
as 2:2017cv00067
Defendant:
BROWN, C. BURKETT, COMMISSIONER and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN D. HAMLET
Miscellaneou:
PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAUDERDALE v. LAYTON et al
as 1:2016cv02684
Defendant:
DEVON CLARK, JOHN LAYTON, WILLIAM RUSSELL and others
Plaintiff:
LAMONE LAUDERDALE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILSON v. ROTHENBURG et al
as 2:2016cv00147
Defendant:
CILLOABACHIE, COLLWAY, DANIEL and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES G. WILSON
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. LAYTON
as 1:2016cv00885
Defendant:
JOHN LAYTON and UNKNOWN DEPUTIES
Plaintiff:
RONALD E. WILLIAMS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILSON v. KERMON et al
as 2:2015cv00188
Defendant:
BALLARD, ROBERT CLOVER, JERRY ELLIS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES G. WILSON
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. KERMON et al
as 2:2015cv00187
Defendant:
BALLARD, ROBERT CLOVER, JERRY ELLIS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES G. WILSON
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHILDS v. LAYTON
as 2:2014cv00401
Petitioner:
RICHARD CHILDS
Respondent:
SHERIFF JOHN LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CHILDS v. LAYTON
as 1:2014cv01964
Petitioner:
RICHARD CHILDS
Respondent:
SHERIFF JOHN LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WILSON v. CURRY et al
as 2:2014cv00320
Defendant:
RAY CASSNOVA, ROBERT E. CLOVER, ROBERT G. CONNELL and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES G. WILSON
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
