Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Warren v. Owens et al
as 7:2009cv00114
Petitioner: Michael John Warren
Respondent: Rissie Owens, Thomas Fordyce and Gerald Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nickerson v. Price et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2009cv00160
Plaintiff: Cedric Nickerson
Defendant: Becky Price, Kenneth Thompson, John Wisener and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Allen v. Wheat et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2008cv00482
Plaintiff: Jerry A Allen
Defendant: K R Wheat, Kenny Thompson, William Delarosa and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Warren v. Telford Medical Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2008cv00182
Plaintiff: John Warren
Defendant: Telford Medical Department and Dr Standley
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Warren v. Quarterman
as 08-10617
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL JOHN WARREN
Respondent - Appellee: NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
John Lynch v. Subia
as 08-15709
Petitioner - Appellant: JOHN WARREN LYNCH
Respondent - Appellee: SUBIA, Warden
Munn v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 5:2007cv01442
Petitioner: John Warren Munn
Respondent: United States Parole Commission and H A Ledezma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
John Warren Lynch v. Subia
as 1:2007cv00785
Petitioner: John Warren Lynch
Respondent: - Subia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Warren v. Quarterman
as 4:2007cv00170
Petitioner: Michael John Warren
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Warren v. Quarterman
as 4:2007cv00770
Petitioner: Michael John Warren
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?