Cases 21 - 30 of 854
Robbins v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Vernon D.K. Robbins and Vernon D.F. Robbins
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Dorina Varner, Keri Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DAVIS
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, ROBERT HOMMAND, E. ARMEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Timmons v. Brittain et al
as 1:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Brandon Timmons
Defendant:
K. Brittain, John Wetzel, N. Wynder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. HALLMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
KARLESTER YOUNG
Defendant:
KIP HALLMAN, PAUL NOEL, JOHN OR JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moton v. Garman et al
as 1:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Myron Moton
Defendant:
Mr. Garman, Deputy Houser, Mr. Vangorder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Ransom et al
as 1:2022cv02070
Plaintiff:
John Taylor
Defendant:
Kevin Ransom, J. Eyer, Dr. Prince and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARMER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv01852
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN M. HARMER
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL and JOHN/JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Staats v. DeMatteis et al
as 1:2022cv01962
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Staats
Defendant:
Delaware Department of Corrections, Claire DeMatteis, Jayme Gravell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Kauffman et al
as 4:2022cv01891
Plaintiff:
Vann L. Bailey and Jason Cisne
Defendant:
K. Kauffman, J. Spyker, G. Ralston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irizarry v. Kauffman et al
as 4:2022cv01892
Plaintiff:
Jason Cisne and Angel Irizarry
Defendant:
K. Kauffman, J. Spyker, G. Ralston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
