Cases 21 - 30 of 444
Murphy v. Johnson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Alfred Murphy
Defendant:
C.O. Johnson, Gwendolyn Davis, C.O. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Jackson
as 1:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Donald Lamar May
Defendant:
Heath Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Turman et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jackson
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Morgan et al
as 1:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Quinterious Williams
Defendant:
Coy Morgan, Officer Horace Jackson and Det. Horace Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Montgomery County Jail (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Shawn Jackson
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luckey v. Jackson et al
as 1:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Tyran Luckey
Defendant:
Health Jackson and Richard Hetrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Calloway et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Keith McKinley Jackson and Keith M. Knowles Jackson
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Jackson et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2022cv00662
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Eugene Thomas
Defendant:
Jake Jackson, Donald Carter and Walter Lee Gray, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Jackson et al
as 1:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Donald Lamar May
Defendant:
Heath Jackson and Lieutenant Pat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Headley et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2022cv00567
Plaintiff:
Olando Jackson and Burger
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley, Michael O. Calhoun, Lamar Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
