Cases 21 - 30 of 369
Jackson v. USA
as 7:2023cv01233
Petitioner:
Anthony Jackson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
GIVENS v. COLLINS et al
as 1:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LEE GIVENS
Defendant:
DR. (FNU) COLLINS, CAPTAIN (FNU) INGRAM, CHRISTOPHER JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Wagner et al
as 5:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Maurice Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Wagner, FNU Smith, FNU Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Holzapfel et al
as 5:2023hc02188
Petitioner:
Delmar Deshion Jackson
Respondent:
Warden W. Holzapfel and Susan Giddings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jackson v. Holzapfel et al
as 5:2023hc02172
Petitioner:
Delmar Deshion Jackson
Respondent:
W. Holzapfel, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Susan Giddings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Meyers v. Marshall et al
as 5:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
FNU Marshall, FNU Cox, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. NURSE (FNU)(LNU) et al
as 1:2023cv00448
Plaintiff:
ANDREW JACKSON ALLEN
Defendant:
NURSE (FNU)(LNU) and DISTRICT ATTORNEY (FNU)(LNU)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. OXENDINE et al
as 1:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
ALBERT JACKSON
Defendant:
JUSTIN OXENDINE, WILBERT WALKER, STEVEN GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. USA
as 3:2023cv00249
Petitioner:
Danielle Jermaine Jackson
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Edwards v. Bullard et al
as 5:2023ct03119
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Edwards
Defendant:
J. Bullard, Mr. Jacobs, Franklin Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
