Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Vincent Kowalewski, III v. James McGrady
as 11-3829
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT JAMES KOWALEWSKI, III
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES MCGRADY, DA BERKS and ATTY GEN PA
Quentin Jackson v. James McGrady, et al
as 11-3548
Plaintiff - Appellant:
QUENTIN TODD JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES MCGRADY, DA DELAWARE COUNTY and ATTY GEN PA
SHANER v. MCGRADY et al
as 2:2011cv01188
Petitioner:
ROBERT RAY SHANER
Respondent:
JAMES MCGRADY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF FAYETTE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John Lasko, Jr. v. James McGrady, et al
as 11-3114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT LASKO, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES MCGRADY, DA MERCER and ATTY GEN PA
Heim v. McVey et al
as 3:2011cv01285
Plaintiff:
Joseph Heim
Defendant:
Catherine McVey, John Wetzell, Shirley Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LASKO v. MCGRADY et al
as 2:2011cv00779
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT LASKO, JR.
Respondent:
JAMES MCGRADY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MERCER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ravanna Spencer v. James McGrady, et al
as 11-2104
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAVANNA SPENCER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES MCGRADY, GOVERNOR COMMONWEALTH OF PA, RUIZ and others
CRESPO v. MCGRADY et al
as 2:2011cv02565
Petitioner:
JOSE CRESPO
Respondent:
JAMES MCGRADY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LAWSON v. MCGRADY et al
as 2:2011cv01030
Petitioner:
JAMEEL LAWSON
Respondent:
JAMES MCGRADY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF HUGH J. BURNS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TOM CORBETT - PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROSE v. MCGRADY et al
as 3:2011cv00253
Plaintiff:
Raymond P. Rose
Defendant:
James McGrady, Joseph Mataloni, John Chopkopak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
