Cases 21 - 30 of 373
Perez-Leal v. Neeley
as 7:2023cv00726
Petitioner:
Claudia Perez-Leal
Respondent:
K Neeley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cook v. Neely
as 7:2023cv00654
Petitioner:
Tiffany Cook
Respondent:
Warden K Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harmon v. Smith (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Korey Devon Harmon
Defendant:
Shamal K. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hensley v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Jason K. Hensley
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Wilcotte Rahming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsey v. Southern Health Partners et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Carlos K. Lindsey, Sr.
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners, Covington County Sheriff's Office, Nurse Marjorie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Gurly et al
as 2:2023cv00316
Plaintiff:
Cortnee K Austin and Courtnee K Austin
Defendant:
Gurly, Love and Pettway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Bowns et al
as 1:2023cv00226
Petitioner:
Nathan Lamar Jones
Respondent:
N Bowns, W Davis, Pressly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foreman v. Neely et al
as 7:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Renata Foreman
Defendant:
Kimberly Neely, D Mosby, C Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Carr et al
as 7:2022cv01432
Plaintiff:
Tymon L Davis
Defendant:
Greg Carr and K Straka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jennings v. Straka et al
as 7:2022cv01387
Petitioner:
Eric Daniel Jennings
Respondent:
K Straka and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
