Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Diaz v. High Intensity Drug Trafficing Administration et al
as 4:2013cv00163
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Diaz
Defendant:
High Intensity Drug Trafficing Administration, Kansas City Missouri Drug Enforcement Agency, Kansas City Missouri Division of Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cordova-Lima v. Kansas Department of Revenue Alcohol Beverage Control et al
as 5:2012cv03040
Plaintiff:
Marvin A. Cordova-Lima
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Revenue Alcohol Beverage Control, Kansas Bureau of Investigation, Kathy Woodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maley v. State of Kansas et al
as 5:2011cv03041
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Maley
Defendant:
State of Kansas and Kansas Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maley v. State of Kansas et al
as 4:2011cv00156
Plaintiff:
Marcus A Maley
Defendant:
State of Kansas and Kansas Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2010cv03202
Petitioner:
Ronald D. Alexander
Respondent:
Kansas, State of, Kansas Bureau of Investigation and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Maley v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2010cv03090
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Maley
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Kansas Bureau of Investigation and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manco v. John/Jane Does, et al
as 09-3251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL WAYNE MANCO
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN/JANE DOES (1), employed as Mail Room Employees by the Kansas Department of Corrections S.A.T.P. and Kansas Bureau of Investigations, in their individual and official capacities, S. BUSER, employed as Mail Room Supervisor, El Dorado Correctional Facility, in her individual and official capacity, JJ SMITH, employed as Sergeant of Intelligence Investigation, El Dorado Correctional Facility, in his individual and official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
