Cases 21 - 30 of 38
DAVIS v. KRUEGER et al
as 2:2017cv00467
Defendant:
CHARLES A. DANIELS, JANE/JOHN DOES, JEFFREY E. KRUEGER and others
Plaintiff:
LEN DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PARKER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2017cv00174
Defendant:
CHARLES A. DANIELS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and DAVID ROYER
Plaintiff:
LEE MCDANIEL PARKER
HSA:
A. RUPSKA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CHADWICK v. NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2017cv00661
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN T. CHADWICK
Defendant:
HALL, MCDANIELS, NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Aramark American Food Services, LLC
as 2:2017cv00008
Plaintiff:
Jason Jones
Defendant:
Aramark American Food Services, LLC , John Schilling , Mike Shultz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CRITTENDEN v. MCDANIEL et al
as 2:2016cv00467
Plaintiff:
JAMES CRITTENDEN
Defendant:
J. DOUGHTY, CHRIS HEFFNER, S. HUMERICKHOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
White v. McDaniel
as 3:2016cv00063
Plaintiff:
Adam N White
Defendant:
S McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2016cv00010
Defendant:
CHARLES A. DANIELS, KIMBERLY LEMONS, D. MARTIN and others
Plaintiff:
LEE MCDANIEL PARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MCDANIEL v. SMITH
as 2:2015cv00307
Petitioner:
STEPHEN MCDANIEL
Respondent:
BRIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PATTERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv00310
Defendant:
BALLARD, BOOKER, BROOKS and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Sir Oscar Guillen Sr v. Haley et al
as 2:2013cv00105
Plaintiff:
Oscar Guillen, Sr
Defendant:
Haley , Fields , Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
