Cases 21 - 30 of 292
CROCKETT III v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01075
Petitioner:
WILLIAM B. CROCKETT III
Respondent:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEO GROUP INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WINTERS BEY v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2023cv00744
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL WINTERS BEY
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, FITCH, FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLEY v. SEVIER
as 1:2023cv00670
Petitioner:
JAMES WILLEY
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCOTT-MANNA v. SEVIER
as 1:2023cv00582
Petitioner:
AHKEEM SHAKUR SCOTT-MANNA
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BONDS v. SEVIER
as 1:2023cv00518
Petitioner:
MARK BONDS
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WRIGHT v. JONES et al
as 1:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
CARLTON WRIGHT
Defendant:
JAMA JONES, MARK SEVIER, JENNIFER FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00443
Plaintiff:
SHAWN JOHNSON
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., MARK SEVIER, LUNDSFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE v. JOSEPH et al
as 1:2023cv00447
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEE
Defendant:
SAMMIE JOSEPH, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (IDOC), R. CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEELE v. SEVIER
as 1:2023cv00409
Petitioner:
HOWARD STEELE
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PLATO v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2023cv00303
Petitioner:
ROBERT J. PLATO, JR.
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
