Cases 21 - 30 of 251
Spratley v. Williams
as 2:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Matthew Spratley
Defendant:
Lt. D. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferebee v. Skinner et al
as 7:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Lorenza Gerald Ferebee, Jr.
Defendant:
M. Skinner, S. Birman, S. Boggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. McCall et al
as 1:2023cv00288
Plaintiff:
Norel Sterling Ward and Norell
Defendant:
Matthew McCall, Mark Jones, Mark B. Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mangus v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thomas Mangus
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Harold W. Clarke, Joseph Walters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grubb v. Smith
as 7:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Matthew Grubb
Defendant:
Brandon Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew v. Gambia et al
as 3:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
Izeh Matthew
Defendant:
Officer Gambia, Officer Casich and Officer Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thacker v. Clarke et al
as 7:2022cv00738
Plaintiff:
Matthew L. Thacker
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, A. David Robinson, Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2022cv00785
Petitioner:
Matthew Allen Turner
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thacker v. Virginia Dep't of Corrections et al
as 7:2022cv00707
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Thacker and Matthew L. Thacker
Defendant:
Virginia Dep't of Corrections, Harold W. Clarke, B. Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Ms. Meade
as 1:2022cv01381
Plaintiff:
Robert Matthew James
Defendant:
Ms. Meade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
