Cases 21 - 30 of 132
GARY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv01708
Petitioner:
RAFAEL A. GARY
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and MICHAEL HARLOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SAUNDERS v. HARLOW
as 2:2013cv07018
Petitioner:
RONALD SAUNDERS
Respondent:
MICHAEL HARLOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maurice Davis v. Michael Harlow, et al
as 13-3989
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL HARLOW and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
SPUCK v. THOMPSON et al
as 3:2013cv00226
Petitioner:
DANIEL L. SPUCK
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON , MICHAEL HARLOW , JOHN WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
QUINONES v. HARLOW et al
as 5:2013cv05071
Petitioner:
JOSE ANTONIO RIVERA QUINONES
Respondent:
MICHAEL HARLOW and PA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roach v. Harlow et al
as 3:2013cv02086
Petitioner:
Louis William Roach
Respondent:
Michael Harlow and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PETTAWAY v. OVERTON et al
as 1:2013cv00213
Plaintiff:
WAYNE PETTAWAY
Defendant:
MAXINE OVERTON, ROBERT MAXA, ROMAN MALINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Nigel Parms v. Michael Harlow, et al
as 13-3091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NIGEL DWAYNE PARMS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL HARLOW, Warden, MRS. P. MCKISSOCK, Hearing Examiner, MRS. MARY LARSON, Education Counselor and others
CARNEVALE v. HARLOW et al
as 2:2013cv00915
Petitioner:
DANIEL THOMAS CARNEVALE
Respondent:
MICHAEL HARLOW and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PHILLIPS v. HARLOW
as 2:2013cv03649
Petitioner:
LARRY PHILLIPS
Respondent:
MICHAEL HARLOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
