Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 440
Howard v. Northern NH Correctional Facility
as 1:2023cv00368
Plaintiff: Paul Howard
Defendant: Northern NH Correctional Facility
Not Classified By Court: NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Doherty v. Northern NH Correctional Facility
as 1:2023cv00366
Plaintiff: James Doherty
Defendant: Northern NH Correctional Facility
Not Classified By Court: NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Fisherman v. NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner et al
as 1:2023cv00349
Plaintiff: Leonard James Fisherman, Jr.
Defendant: NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner, NH Department of Corrections, Warden, John Doe #1 and others
Not Classified By Court: NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Covington v. Northern NH Correctional Facility, Warden
as 1:2023cv00331
Petitioner: James Covington
Respondent: Northern NH Correctional Facility, Warden
Not Classified By Court: NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fortune v. NH Department of Corrections, Medical Director et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00286
Plaintiff: John Fortune
Defendant: NH Department of Corrections, Medical Director and NH Department of Corrections, Dental Director
Not Classified By Court: NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only), NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only), NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Heath v. NH State Prison for Men, Warden
as 1:2023fp00276
Petitioner: Mark Heath
Respondent: NH State Prison for Men, Warden
Not Classified By Court: NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only) and NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stow v. Davis
as 23-1415
Plaintiff / Appellant: WESTON J. STOW
Defendant / Appellee: ANNE DAVIS, Dr., Phd., Education Principal and Supervisor of NHDOC Library Services, NH State Prison for Men and ANNE DAVIS, Doctor, Phd., Education Principal and Supervisor of NHDOC Library Services, NH State Prison for Men
Defendant: GEORGE CORRIVEAU, Nurse, Northern NH Correctional Facility
Interested Party: JOHN M. FORMELLA, NH Attorney General and NH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Marin v. NH State Prison for Women, Warden
as 1:2023cv00265
Petitioner: Katlyn Marin
Respondent: NH State Prison for Women, Warden
Not Classified By Court: NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woodham v. Grafton County Department of Corrections
as 1:2023cv00195
Petitioner: Grace Woodham
Respondent: Grafton County Department of Corrections
Not Classified By Court: NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Avery v. NH, State of We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00245
Petitioner: Edgar Clifford Avery, Jr.
Respondent: NH, State of
Not Classified By Court: NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?