Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Nottingham v. Harry et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00595
Defendant: Matthew Welickovitch, Jason Cooley, Brandon Renner and others
Plaintiff: James E. Nottingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nottingham v. Gray et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv02002
Respondent: PA Attorney General, Nancy Butts and Richard A. Gray
Petitioner: James E. Nottingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Elliott v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 3:2016cv03232
Plaintiff: Michael Elliott
Defendant: United States Department of Justice, NFN Stevens, Lee Grenenger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nottingham v. USA
as 3:2016cv00006
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Monte James Nottingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Nottingham v. USA
as 3:2016cv03852
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Monte James Nottingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Nottingham v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2016225500007
Petitioner: Monte James Nottingham
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nottingham v. USA
as 3:2016cv00007
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Monte James Nottingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Nottingham v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2016225500006
Petitioner: Monte James Nottingham
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nottingham v. USA
as 3:2016cv03851
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Monte James Nottingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jay Nottingham v. Warden Bill Clements Unit, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-10163
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAY ANTHONY NOTTINGHAM, also known as Jay Nottingham, also known as Jeffrey Montgomery, also known as Jay Dillon
Defendant - Appellee: WARDEN, Bill Clements Unit, UNNAMED ADMIN STAFF and UNNAMED MEDICAL STAFF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?