Cases 21 - 30 of 403
Phillips v. Earls et al
as 4:2023cv00675
Plaintiff:
Michael Phillips
Defendant:
Earls, Lewis and Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Singleton v. Camacho et al
as 4:2023cv00482
Plaintiff:
Delton E Singleton
Defendant:
Commocho, Phillips, Camacho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Phillips et al
as 6:2023cv06060
Plaintiff:
Bryan Andrew Lewis
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Fred Phillips and Sheriff Scott Finkbinor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pratt v. Rickey, et al
as 1:2023cv01039
Plaintiff:
Barry Michael Pratt, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Robert Rickey, Chief Deputy Charlie Phillips, Ricky Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Phillips
as 6:2023cv06053
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Undrey Johnson
Defendant:
Captain Fred Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Putman v Elkins et al
as 6:2023cv06052
Plaintiff:
Johnanthony Ray Putman
Defendant:
Dr. Darrell Elkins and Jail Administrator Fred Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Stewart v. Stoval et al
as 4:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Phillip Dewayne Stewart
Defendant:
Stoval, Eric S Higgins and Devore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Putman v. Phillips et al
as 6:2023cv06049
Plaintiff:
Johnanthony Ray Putman
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Fred Phillips, Corporal Passmore, Dr. Elkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Yates
as 2:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Tracey Blair Phillips
Defendant:
Doe and John P Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Putman v. Maher et al
as 6:2023cv06041
Plaintiff:
Johnanthony Ray Putman
Defendant:
Sergeant Maher, Jail Administrator Fred Phillips and Sheriff Scott Finkbeiner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
