Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Duna v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2013cv12033
Plaintiff:
Alex Duna
Defendant:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement , Plymouth County Sheriff's Department and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
KOUACH v. PLYMOUTH COUNTY POLICE et al
as 2:2013cv03026
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN KOVACH
Defendant:
PLYMOUTH COUNTY POLICE, MONTGOMERY COUNTY D.A., JODI GRIFFIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tang v. Keefe Commissary Network, et al
as 08-2176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOAN TANG
Defendant - Appellee:
KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK, PLYMOUTH COUNTY, JOE MCDONALD and others
Tang v. Brandolini et al
as 1:2008cv11478
Plaintiff:
Toan Tang
Defendant:
Ronald Brandolini, Emery Martin, Captain Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tang v. Plymouth County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2008cv11380
Plaintiff:
Toan Tang
Defendant:
Plymouth County Correctional Facility, Joseph D. McDonald and Brian H. Gillen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tang v. Keefe Commissary Network et al
as 1:2008cv11378
Plaintiff:
Toan Tang
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network, Plymouth County Correctional Facility, Joe McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Isabelle v. Mansfield, et al
as 08-1982
Petitioner - Appellant:
HEATHER ISABELLE
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN L. MANSFIELD, Chief Probation Officer, Plymouth County and ELIZABETH HALLORAN, Plymouth County Probation Officer
Tang v. Plymouth County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2008cv11292
Plaintiff:
Toan Tang
Defendant:
Plymouth County Correctional Facility, Joseph D. McDonald and Brian H. Gillen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ekasala v. Plymouth County Correctional Facility
as 1:2007cv11332
Petitioner:
William P. Ekasala
Respondent:
Plymouth County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
