Cases 21 - 30 of 386
Robinson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Warden Forrest City Medium
as 1:2023cv01073
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Robinson
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons Warden Forrest City Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Robinson v. Doe
as 2:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Donald Robinson
Defendant:
Doe, Tyrone D Allison, Leavy Watson, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Lavon Lewis
Defendant:
Chris Johnson, Franklin Leron Graham and Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Earl et al
as 4:2023cv00454
Plaintiff:
Justin Dow Barnes
Defendant:
D Earl, Louis, MacDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Kessel
as 2:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Clarence Robinson
Defendant:
Doe and E Kessel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Higginbotham v. Belcher et al
as 2:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Shawn Higginbotham
Defendant:
Belcher, Gary Kerstein, Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tigue v. Belcher et al
as 2:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Rickie Lynn Tigue, Jr
Defendant:
Belcher, Gary Kerstein, Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Otwell et al
as 4:2023cv04042
Plaintiff:
James Earl Robinson
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Steve Otwell, Darrell Elkin, P.A., Lt. Karen Ghormley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rucker v. Page et al
as 4:2023cv00339
Plaintiff:
Rartavis Rucker
Defendant:
Joe Page, Mary Cobbs, Ryan Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Etherly et al
as 2:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Douglas Taylor
Defendant:
Etherly, Kelley, Grahm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
