Cases 21 - 30 of 406
Ruffin v. Sandoval et al
as 1:2023cv01301
Plaintiff:
David Antonio Ruffin
Defendant:
Stephanie Sandoval, Chelsea Soto, Justin Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramon Ruffin v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 23-1818
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAMON RUFFIN
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Malcolm Muhammad v. Ms. Allen
as 23-6388
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALCOLM MUHAMMAD
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. ALLEN, Medical Regional Admininstrator
Defendant:
ASSISTANT WARDEN WHITE, I. T. GILMORE, Warden, J. ADAMS, Unit Manager and others
Ruffin v. Davis et al
as 3:2023cv01425
Plaintiff:
Brittany Ruffin
Defendant:
Kevin Davis, William Holbrook, City of Columbia Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
RUFFIN v. DIXON
as 5:2023cv00053
Petitioner:
MICHAEL RUFFIN
Respondent:
MARK INCH and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruffin v. Spurlock et al
as 1:2023cv00561
Plaintiff:
David Antonio Ruffin
Defendant:
Tony G. Spurlock, Penny, Douglas County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruffin v. Sandoval
as 1:2023cv00556
Petitioner:
David Antonio Ruffin
Respondent:
Stephanie Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruffin v. Sandoval
as 1:2023cv00554
Petitioner:
David Antonio Ruffin
Respondent:
Stephanie Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruffin v. Sandoval
as 1:2023cv00308
Petitioner:
David Antonio Ruffin
Respondent:
Stephanie Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demetrius Glenn v. Adam Ruffin
as 23-6034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMETRIUS GLENN
Defendant / Appellee:
ADAM RUFFIN, Attorney, MICHAEL HENTHORNE, Attorney, MS. WILLIAMS, Lt SCDC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
