Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Schatten v. State of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2018cv12066
Respondent:
State of Massachusetts and Maura Healey
Petitioner:
Adam B. Schatten
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv11860
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ankuda v. Huckshorn et al
as 1:2018cv11054
Petitioner:
Paul J. Ankuda
Respondent:
Kevin Huckshorn and State of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clemente, et al v. O'Brien, et al
as 15-1528
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAMIAN CLEMENTE and ANTHONY CLEMENTE
Respondent - Appellee:
LUIS S. SPENCER, Superintendent, MCI Norfolk, MARTHA COAKLEY, Attorney General of the State of Massachusetts and STEVEN J. O'BRIEN
Bone v. The Attorney General of the State of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2014cv13487
Petitioner:
Elston Bone
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Massachusetts, Norfolk County Superior Court, Commissioner of Departmentof Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv40035
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spencer v. State of Massachusetts
as 1:2013cv11922
Petitioner:
Barry Spencer, Jr
Respondent:
State of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marshall v. Bristol Superior Court
as 13-1965
Petitioner - Appellee:
RYAN MARSHALL
Respondent - Appellant:
BRISTOL COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS
Lyles v. State of Massachusetts
as 1:2012cv00716
Plaintiff:
Milton Lyles
Defendant:
State of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Judd v. Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 4:2011mc94007
Plaintiff:
Keith Russell Judd
Defendant:
Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and State of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
