Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Watson v. State of Michigan et al
as 2:2018cv10518
Plaintiff:
Oscar Lee Watson
Defendant:
State of Michigan, Sherman Campbell, David Messer and others
ROSA-DIAZ v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2017cv00200
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL ROSA-DIAZ
Defendant:
MICHAEL OVERMYER, J. BEACH, HEFFERNAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JORDAN v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2016cv00307
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, MICHEAL D. OVERMYER, SARAH SIEGEL and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID V. JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2016cv00411
Plaintiff:
Anthony T. Williams
Defendant:
State of Hawai'i, David Ige, STATE OF GEORGIA ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. STATE OF HAWAII et al
as 1:2016cv01363
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY T. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
STATE OF HAWAII, DAVID IGE, STATE OF GEORGIA ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSA-DIAZ v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2016cv00155
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL ROSA-DIAZ
Defendant:
M. OVERMYER, D. OBERLANDER, S. SIEGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIEGEL v. GIROUX et al
as 1:2015cv00297
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Petitioner:
STEVEN SIEGEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TABANSI v. SCI FOREST J-BLOCK RHU ET AL et al
as 1:2015cv00261
Plaintiff:
SEHU KESSA SAA TABANSI
Defendant:
SCI FOREST J-BLOCK RHU ET AL, MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, JEFFREY HORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orvel Lloyd v. John Kalinowski, et al
as 15-14626
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ORVEL WINSTON LLOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN KALINOWSKI, in his individual capacity, ROBERT FOSTER, in his individual capacity, STEPHEN SIEGEL, in his individual capacity and others
WILLIAMS V. PA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL
as 1:2015cv00222
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
PA DEPT OF CORRECTION , SARAH SIEGEL , D. MECK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
