Cases 21 - 30 of 105
(PC) Gipbsin v. Soares et al
as 2:2018cv02939
Plaintiff:
Clarence A. Gipbsin
Defendant:
Marcus Bole, Daniel Moeller, Ana Soares and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
El-Shaddai v. Board of Parole Hearings et al
as 4:2018cv05567
Plaintiff:
Adonai El-Shaddai
Defendant:
Robert Dawkin, Ana Soares and Board of Parole Hearings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Puckett v. Galindo et al
as 1:2018cv00955
Defendant:
E. Reyes, T Eilers, T.W. Steadman and others
Plaintiff:
Durrell Anthony Puckett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Puckett v. Galindo et al
as 2:2018cv01918
Defendant:
E. Reyes, T Eilers, T.W. Steadman and others
Plaintiff:
Durrell Anthony Puckett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soares v. Dumanis et al
as 3:2017cv02478
Plaintiff:
Manuel M. Soares
Defendant:
Bonnie Dumanis, Jesus Rodriguez, Rick Clabby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Stile v. Somerset County, et al
as 16-2151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES STILE
Defendant - Appellee:
HERRERA, Corrections Officer, PIKE, Corrections Officer, SOMERSET COUNTY and others
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE, MAINE STATE BOARD OF CORRECTIONS, POULIN, Corrections Officer and others
Stile v. Somerset County, et al
as 16-1181
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES STILE
Defendant - Appellee:
HERRERA, Corrections Officer, PIKE, Corrections Officer, SOMERSET COUNTY and others
Stile v. Somerset County, et al
as 16-1180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES STILE
Defendant - Appellee:
HERRERA, Corrections Officer, PIKE, Corrections Officer, SOMERSET COUNTY and others
Toevs v. Quinn et al
as 1:2015cv02838
Plaintiff:
Janos Toevs
Defendant:
James Quinn, Nicole Gellar, John Suthers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ratliff v. Voong et al
as 3:2015cv05625
Plaintiff:
Deveron Ratliff
Defendant:
M. Voong, M. E. Spearman, J. A. Soares and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
