Cases 21 - 30 of 37
May v Hetzel et al
as 1:2015cv00230
Plaintiff:
Deric LaVelle May
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Karen Stone and Bennie Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Rutherford et al
as 5:2015cv00318
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Stone
Defendant:
Stacey Rutherford, Madison County Sheriffs Department, Madison County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. Stone et al
as 1:2015cv00025
Plaintiff:
Deric LaVelle May
Defendant:
Karen Stone, Bennie Andrews and Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Callahan et al
as 5:2014cv01546
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Stone
Defendant:
Rebekah A Callahan, Alabama, State of, Madison County, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Thomas
as 5:2014cv01022
Plaintiff:
Clarence Stone
Defendant:
Kim Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Thomas et al
as 2:2013cv01329
Petitioner:
Westley Khadafy Stone, III
Respondent:
Kim T Thomas and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stone v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv08032
Petitioner:
Laturus M. Stone
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Stone v. Hetzel, et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00844
Plaintiff:
Roger Stone
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel , Kenneth Sconyers and Kenneth Drake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Talley et al
as 4:2011cv02813
Plaintiff:
Victor Allen Thomas
Defendant:
Talley, Oath, CMS Director and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Kilby Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00523
Plaintiff:
Randall Dwight Stone
Defendant:
Kilby Correctional Facility, Correctional Medical Service, Warden Kilby Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
