Cases 21 - 30 of 96
Sinkfield v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv00149
Defendant:
J. Brown, J. Bowles, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice J. Sinkfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LeGrand v. Volkov et al
as 1:2019cv01422
Defendant:
Mr Emerson, Mr Casse, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Martell A LeGrand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston v. Bolster et al
as 2:2019cv00552
Defendant:
Warden Bolster, SHU Supervisor, Chaplain Houston and others
Plaintiff:
Darien Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Keyes v. Swann et al
as 3:2019cv00564
Plaintiff:
Darnell Alonzo Keyes and Darnell Alonzo Keys
Defendant:
R.N. Walton, Ms. Cunningham, A.W. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Labarge v. Breckon et al
as 7:2019cv00289
Petitioner:
Branden M. Labarge
Respondent:
The United States Attorney General, M. Breckon and The Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Coleman v. United States of America Corporation et al
as 7:2019cv00251
Defendant:
Secor Corporation, Federal Bureau of Prisons Corporation, Jim Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Dominick R. Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coleman v. Warden
as 7:2019cv00252
Respondent:
Secor Corporation, Jim Davis, Piedmont Regional Jail Corporation and others
Petitioner:
Dominick R. Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chase v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al.
as 3:2018cv00364
Plaintiff:
Richard Chase
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Johnathan Ray Ormond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Candela v. Wilson et al
as 2:2017cv00652
Petitioner:
Salvatore Candela
Respondent:
Warden Wilson and U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons FCC Petersburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00441
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
