Cases 21 - 30 of 71
Brinkley v. Williams
as 23-3050
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHERRELL GARY BRINKLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
TOMMY WILLIAMS
Dudley (ID 91359) v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv03074
Plaintiff:
James Richard Dudley
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections, Jeff Zmuda, Darcie Holthaus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald (ID 113183) v. Williams
as 5:2023cv03054
Plaintiff:
Sean E. McDonald
Defendant:
Tommy Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruhl v. Williams
as 5:2023cv03053
Petitioner:
Tyler A. Ruhl
Respondent:
Tommy Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brinkley (ID 60164) v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2023cv03047
Petitioner:
Sherrell Gary Brinkley
Respondent:
Kansas, State of and Tommy Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams #525474 v. Schiebner
as 1:2023cv00164
Petitioner:
Tommy Williams #525474
Respondent:
James Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams #525474 v. Knapp
as 1:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Tommy Williams #525474
Defendant:
Unknown Knapp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dudley (ID 91359) v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv03016
Plaintiff:
James Richard Dudley
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections, Jeff Zmuda, Darcie Holthaus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calvin v. Corrections, Kansas Department of et al
as 2:2022cv02544
Plaintiff:
John Keith Calvin
Defendant:
Corrections, Kansas Department of and Tommy Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calvin v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2022cv03317
Plaintiff:
John Keith Calvin
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections and Tommy Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
