Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Inesti v. People of the State of NY
as 1:2013cv06351
Petitioner:
Mark Inesti
Respondent:
People of the State of NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
People of the State of NY v. Best
as 1:2012cv07021
Plaintiff:
People of the State of NY
Defendant:
Hilary Best
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gamez v. NYC Docs and Commands et al
as 1:2012cv06138
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Gamez
Defendant:
NYC Docs and Commands, Singleton, The State of NY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beaman v. Smith et al
as 1:2012cv05657
Plaintiff:
Shelton Beaman
Defendant:
Smith, Ferguson, Lemons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koso v. The Attorney General of the State of NY
as 2:2012cv01723
Petitioner:
Linda A. Koso
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brodeur v. The City and State of NY et al
as 1:2011cv06681
Plaintiff:
Christopher X. Brodeur
Defendant:
The City and State of NY, The NYC Dept of Correction, Cyrus Vance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Piskanin, Jr. v. NJ Superior Court, et al
as 11-1569
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
NJ SUPERIOR COURT, DAVID J. WEAVER, State Attorney, STATE OF NY, AND CERTAIN UNNAMED AGENTS and others
Kelso v. State of NY et al
as 1:2011cv00174
Petitioner:
Douglas E. Kelso
Respondent:
State of NY, Orange County, NY and Town of Newburgh, NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Piskanin, Jr. v. Kenneth Cameron, et al
as 10-2356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH P. CAMERON, Superintendent, SCI Cresson, STATE OF NY and STATE OF NJ
Levesque v. NH State Prison, et al
as 10-1592
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE R. LEVESQUE
Defendant - Appellee:
NH STATE PRISON, STATE OF VT and STATE OF NY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
