Cases 21 - 30 of 159
Levitski v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv01012
Plaintiff:
Douglas M Levitski
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Thomas Bell, Richard Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ingram v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv00869
Plaintiff:
Grady Ingram
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Thomas Bell, Richard Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Westover v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv00699
Plaintiff:
Raymond M Westover
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Thomas Bell, Richard Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero #231853 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv00665
Plaintiff:
Davis Michael Romero
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Thomas Bell, A Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meacham v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv00343
Plaintiff:
Mark Colyn Meacham
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Bruce McMorron, Abbe King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2013cv00063
Plaintiff:
Joe Thomas Bell
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Justin Jones, Phillip Langston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TwoRivers v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv00233
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, S Erno, Thomas Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Christian Weaver TwoRivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Bell et al
as 2:2013cv00163
Plaintiff:
Jose J Rodriguez
Defendant:
Thomas Bell, Wexford Health Sources Incorporated and Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dewayne Span v. Thomas Bell
as 13-1030
Petitioner - Appellant:
DEWAYNE SPAN
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS BELL, Warden
Valenzuela #172770 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv02734
Plaintiff:
Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Kimberly Neubauer, Janice K Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
