Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Timothy Lee v. Gaines County Sheriff's Office, et al
as 17-10851
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY PATRICK LEE
Defendant - Appellee:
GAINES COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, SOUTH PLAINS TASK FORCE and ARTHUR AGUILAR, JR.
DUNIGAN v. CLARK et al
as 1:2017cv00209
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY PATRICK DUNIGAN, IV
Respondent:
MICHAEL CLARK, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Gaines County Sheriff
as 5:2017cv00179
Petitioner:
Timothy Patrick Lee
Respondent:
Gaines County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lee v. Bermear
as 5:2017cv00160
Plaintiff:
Timothy Patrick Lee
Defendant:
Mike Bermear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. 106th Judicial District of Texas
as 5:2017cv00133
Petitioner:
Timothy Patrick Lee
Respondent:
106th Judicial District of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lee v. Seminole Police Department et al
as 5:2017cv00055
Plaintiff:
Timothy Patrick Lee
Defendant:
Seminole Police Department, Corey Furlow and Victor Montes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Lubbock County Sheriffs Office et al
as 5:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
Timothy Patrick Lee
Defendant:
Lubbock County Sheriffs Office and Wal-Mart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Seminole Police Department et al
as 5:2017cv00043
Plaintiff:
Timothy Patrick Lee
Defendant:
Seminole Police Department, Gaines County Community Supervision and 106th District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Brownfield Police Department et al
as 5:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
Timothy Patrick Lee
Defendant:
Brownfield Police Department and Terry County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Texas Mental Health and Mental Retardation
as 5:2017cv00042
Plaintiff:
Timothy Patrick Lee
Defendant:
Texas Mental Health and Mental Retardation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
