Cases 21 - 30 of 46
CARTER v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2011cv04243
Plaintiff:
DENNIS CARTER
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, JOHN DOE, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davie Harrison v. John Arasor, et al
as 11-10568
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVIE HARRISON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE DALLAS DIVISION, JOHN ARAGOR, Agent, and Other Unknown Names John Doe Agents, UNITED STATES JUSTICE DEPARTMENT and others
CRIER v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2011cv00192
Plaintiff:
LARRY SCOTT
Defendant:
MICHEAL NUTTER, JOHN DOE, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARDY v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2010cv06846
Plaintiff:
KEITH HARDY
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, JOHN DOE, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIETZ v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2010cv06149
Plaintiff:
DAVID DIETZ
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, JOHN DOE, D.O.C. PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2010cv06148
Plaintiff:
TARON COLEMAN
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, JOHN DOE, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2010cv05428
Plaintiff:
RONALD WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, JOHN DOE, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rahman v. Wingate et al
as 1:2010cv03903
Petitioner:
Yusuf Abdur Rahman
Respondent:
S. Wingate, Duke Terrell, United States Justice Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pinkney v. United States Justice Department et al
as 1:2010cv00102
Petitioner:
Tracy Pinkney
Respondent:
United States Justice Department, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Sniezek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Peeples v. United States Justice Department
as 1:2009cv00656
Petitioner:
Mario Andjuan Peeples
Respondent:
United States Justice Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
