Cases 21 - 30 of 1,695
Paul v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Western District of Arkansas)
as 6:2024cv06034
Petitioner:
Jeffery William Paul
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Seadorf v. Damante et al
as 2:2024cv02035
Plaintiff:
Arthur William Seadorf, Sr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Jim Damante, Officer Jonathan Stroud and Booking Officer Reed Ingram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koontz v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Morris B Koontz
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Moses Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunahue v. Jackson et al
as 4:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Reginald Dunahue
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, Dexter Payne, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayfield v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
William Mayfield
Defendant:
Doe and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tavron v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Mose Jackson, III, M Richarson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Mena et al
as 4:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Lee Andrew Foster, Jr
Defendant:
Mary Mena, Robin Collins, Sierra Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neice v. City of Van Buren, Arkansas
as 2:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
Richard William Neice
Defendant:
City of Van Buren, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stockton v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stockton
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Wellpath LLC, Bobby Glover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Randle et al
as 4:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Terrence Moore
Defendant:
Kenyon Randle, Paul Harris, Etherly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
