Cases 21 - 30 of 162
Hernandez v. McKinley, et al.
as 1:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Hernandez
Defendant:
James McKinley, James Boparao, Quintin Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Paralegal Lifang et al
as 1:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Paralegal Lifang, Robbert Wheiler, Warden Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 1:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
Joseph Williams
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated and Director IDOC Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Williams
as 1:2021cv00467
Plaintiff:
Eric Swain Johnson
Defendant:
Brandon Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Veenstra, et al. v. Little, et al.
as 1:2021cv00341
Plaintiff:
Albert Pete Veenstra, III, Kent Ellis, Charles Lynn Sacolick and others
Defendant:
Brad Little, Idaho State Board of Correction Members, Director IDOC Josh Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smrz v. Christensen ISCC
as 1:2021cv00216
Respondent:
Christensen ISCC
Petitioner:
Patrick Edward William Smrz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fletcher v. The State of Idaho
as 1:2021cv00100
Petitioner:
William Fletcher
Defendant:
The State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Butler v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2020cv00428
Defendant:
Wardenr Al Ramirez and Idaho Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
William Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huff v. Idaho State Correctional Center et al
as 1:2020cv00421
Defendant:
Idaho State Correctional Center, Joshua Rankins and Jay Christensen
Plaintiff:
William James Huff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoak v. Commission for Pardons and Parole, et al.
as 1:2020cv00299
Plaintiff:
Larry M. Hoak
Defendant:
Shelly Williams, Commission for Pardons and Parole, One Unknowen Individual and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
