Cases 21 - 30 of 206
WOODS v. GARNETT
as 2:2022cv04984
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL WOODS
Defendant:
C.O. GARNETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. SPAGEL et al
as 1:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD SPAGEL, OFFICER PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWALD v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv04625
Plaintiff:
TROY LEWALD
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WELLPATH HOLDINGS LLC, KIP HALLMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. SCI FAYETTE et al
as 2:2022cv01023
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HALL
Defendant:
SCI FAYETTE, ERIC ARMEL, B. RUDZIENSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: WOODS
as 2:2022cv02518
Plaintiff:
IN RE: DANIEL M. WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2022cv00444
Plaintiff:
RALPH O. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ATTORNEY WENDY WILLIAMS, ATTORNEY RALPH KARSH, OFFICER JUSTIN P. KNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LAFFEY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv00296
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS LAFFEY
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, MARK CAPOZZA, CO I EMMINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
YELVERTON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv01727
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER C. YELVERTON
Defendant:
SECRETARY JOHN E. WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL ZAKEN, DEPUTY STEPHAN BUZAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Woods v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv02087
Plaintiff:
Shamone Woods
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Lt. Carpenter, S. Wiggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MASSAQUOI v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01170
Plaintiff:
MANNA MASSAQUOI
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, STEPHEN BUZAS, MAUREEN MALANOSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
