Cases 31 - 40 of 137
Hewitt v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2022cv00586
Plaintiff:
Pat Hewitt
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Warden Dan Redington, John or Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson-Bey v. Redington
as 2:2022cv00007
Petitioner:
Aaron-Hassan Johnson-Bey
Respondent:
Warden Dan Redington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McCoy v. Pree et al
as 4:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
Richard Lynn McCoy, Jr
Defendant:
Unknown Pree, Unknown Wynn, Unknown Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spates v. Buckner et al
as 4:2022cv00011
Petitioner:
Christopher Spates
Respondent:
Warden Michelle Buckner, Eric Schmitt and Michelle Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Borschnack v. Brewer
as 4:2021cv01420
Petitioner:
Bille Borschnack and Billie J. Borschnack
Respondent:
Warden Chris Brewer and Chris Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson-Bey v. Redington
as 2:2021cv00066
Petitioner:
Aaron-Hassan Johnson-Bey
Respondent:
Warden Dan Redington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hefley v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv01050
Plaintiff:
Dustin Hefley and Warden Dan Redington
Defendant:
Corizon Health Inc., Anne L. Precythe, Lori Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nailor v. Buckner et al
as 6:2021cv03205
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Nailor
Defendant:
Michele Buckner, Anne L. Precythe, Warden Jeff Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramsey v. Precythe et al
as 4:2021cv00930
Plaintiff:
Sean Nicholas Ramsey
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Thomas Reagan, David Vandergriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Smith
as 6:2021cv03154
Petitioner:
Michael Allen Smith, Sr.
Respondent:
M.D. Smith and Warden J.E. Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
