Cases 31 - 40 of 668
THOMPSON v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01358
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS THOMPSON
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, JOSEPH MCCUTCHEONS, CHRISTINA CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Angle et al
as 3:2023cv00695
Plaintiff:
John A Hawkins, John A Hawkins-El and John Anthony Hawkins-El
Defendant:
Nathan Angle, B Myers, Ind Dep't of Correction's and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAWKINS-EL v. ANGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. HAWKINS-EL
Defendant:
NATHAN ANGLE and B. MYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Bogenschutz
as 1:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
Jason B Brown
Defendant:
Derek Bogenschutz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kreger v. Whitley County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
Dena Lucille Kreger and Dena L Kreger
Defendant:
Whitley County Jail, Calhoune, Yegal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kreger v. Whitley County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv00616
Plaintiff:
Dena Lucille Kreger and Dena L Kreger
Defendant:
Whitley County Jail, Calhoune, Yegal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Wexford et al
as 3:2023cv00607
Defendant:
Wexford, Centurion, Corizon and others
Plaintiff:
DeJuan Lowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miksch v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00565
Petitioner:
John Miksch and John B Miksch
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FLETCHER v. RULE et al
as 2:2023cv00306
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. FLETCHER
Defendant:
T. RULE, DEUSCH, MAKELLAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
CROCKETT III v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01075
Petitioner:
WILLIAM B. CROCKETT III
Respondent:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEO GROUP INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
