Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01773
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Waseem Daker v. John Dawes, et al
as 14-13054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MARK DAWES, BRADLEY LOUIS MCENTYRE, MARK ANTHONY BISHOP and others
Waseem Daker v. John Dawes, et al
as 14-13046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MARK DAWES, Detective, BRADLEY LOUIS MCENTYRE, Detective, GEORGE B. HATFIELD, Chief, Cobb County Police Department and others
Waseem Daker v. John Dawes, et al
as 14-10780
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MARK DAWES, Detective, BRADLEY LOUIS MCENTYRE, Detective, GEORGE B. HATFIELD, Chief, Cobb County Police Department and others
Waseem Daker v. John Dawes, et al
as 13-14878
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MARK DAWES, Detective, BRADLEY LOUIS MCENTYRE, Detective, GEORGE B. HATFIELD, Chief, Cobb County Police Department and others
Miller v. Louisiana et al
as 5:2013cv00609
Plaintiff:
Dale Miller
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Byron Hebert, William Babin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Louisiana et al
as 6:2013cv00609
Plaintiff:
Dale Miller
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Byron Hebert, William Babin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawes v. Secretary Florida Dept of Corrections et al
as 0:2013cv60192
Plaintiff:
Edmund Dawes
Defendant:
Secretary Florida Dept of Corrections and State of Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daker v. Dawes et al
as 1:2012cv02782
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
John Mark Dawes, Bradley Louis McEntyre, Mark Anthony Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawes v. Racette
as 9:2012cv00718
Petitioner:
Ian Dawes
Respondent:
S.E. Racette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
