Cases 31 - 40 of 249
Jones v. Richard et al
as 5:2022cv00508
Plaintiff:
Xavier Lee Jones
Defendant:
Li Richard, Mims Gregory, D. Wangoner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv23069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lopez v. Semple
as 22-1806
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Treizy Treizon Lopez
Defendant / Appellee:
Kenneth Butricks, Salvatore, Captain, Eberle, Eberle and others
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Edward Maldonado, Lis, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Brown v. New York City Police Department
as 22-1468
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Noel Brown
Defendant / Appellee:
NYPD P.O. Anthony Kempinski, Badge #26684, NYPD P.O. Kim Li, Badge #13537, City of New York and others
Defendant:
New York City Police Department, Fifth Precinct New York County, William Doyle and others
Robertson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
James Robertson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Richard Li, Mary Welti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
USA v. Fuhai Li
as 22-2086
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FUHAI LI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Smith v. Li
as 3:2022cv00270
Plaintiff:
Oscar Smith
Defendant:
Dr. Feng Li
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
