Cases 31 - 40 of 521
Wilson v. US Attorney et al
as 5:2023hc02037
Petitioner:
Andrew Scott Wilson
Respondent:
US Attorney and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wilson v. FCC Butner et al
as 5:2022ct03457
Plaintiff:
Andrew Scott Wilson
Defendant:
FCC Butner, Lynn B. Kelly, Officer Sosa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wilson v. USA
as 5:2022cv00501
Petitioner:
Andrew Scott Wilson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Stepp v. Buffaloe
as 5:2022hc02201
Petitioner:
Joshua Andrew Stepp
Respondent:
Eddie M. Buffaloe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ellis v. Warden of Central Prison et al
as 5:2022ct03425
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ellis
Defendant:
Warden of Central Prison, Ramel Freeman and Donnie R. Raynor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2022cv00929
Plaintiff:
ANDREW M. KING
Defendant:
TERRY JOHNSON, RAHEEM ALEEM, OFFICER HERBIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joyner v. Boyd et al
as 5:2022ct03389
Plaintiff:
Travis M. Joyner
Defendant:
Andrew R. Boyd, Stephan M. Hagen and Judge Haigwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Chisel-Wilson et al
as 5:2022ct03380
Plaintiff:
Robert Dwayne Lewis
Defendant:
Tara Chisel-Wilson, Curtis Ward, Christina Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. JOHNSON
as 1:2022cv00855
Plaintiff:
ANDREW M. KING
Defendant:
TERRY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Sullivan et al
as 5:2022ct03341
Plaintiff:
Ricky Butler
Defendant:
Warden Sullivan, Warden Ramos, Captain Fringley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
