Cases 31 - 40 of 203
West v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2022cv00259
Petitioner:
Anthony J. West
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Hazelton F.C.I. Warden and Hazelton F.C.I. Psychology Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jackson v. Aldridge et al
as 3:2022cv00443
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Jackson, II
Defendant:
Superintendent Aldridge, Unit Manager Moore, Sgt. Petticrew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baxter v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv00490
Plaintiff:
Arthur Anthony Baxter
Defendant:
United States of America and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Moore et al
as 3:2022cv00452
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Jackson, II
Defendant:
Unit Manager Moore, Active Superintendent, Betsy Jividen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casey v. Bare et al
as 5:2022cv00464
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Casey
Defendant:
Corporal Hannah Bare, Corporal Pack, Officer Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cade v. Lovett
as 3:2022cv00179
Petitioner:
Shawn Anthony Cade
Respondent:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Foy v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00174
Petitioner:
Anthony Foy
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
A.D. v. Demetro et al
as 2:2022cv00432
Plaintiff:
A. D.
Defendant:
Anthony Demetro, David Jones, Matthew Currence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Venneri v. Bayless
as 5:2022cv00242
Petitioner:
Anthony Venneri
Respondent:
M.J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
K. S. v. Demetro et al
as 2:2022cv00422
Plaintiff:
K. S.
Defendant:
Anthony Demetro, Matthew Currence and West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
