Cases 31 - 40 of 54
WHITE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv05372
Plaintiff:
KAMALI WHITE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LOUIS GIORLA, DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pavalone v. Lackawanna County Prison et al
as 1:2011cv01444
Plaintiff:
Paul Joseph Pavalone
Defendant:
Lackawanna County Prison, Correctional Care Inc., Aramark Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKINNEY v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2011cv04188
Plaintiff:
TRACEY MCKINNEY
Defendant:
LOUIS GIORLA, WILLIAM E. LAWTON, SAGREIYA SIDDHARTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARREN v. ARAMARK et al
as 5:2011cv02479
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WARREN
Defendant:
ARAMARK, PRIMCARE MEDICAL INC., NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AVERY v. CITY OF COATESVILLE et al
as 2:2011cv00864
Plaintiff:
PRESTON AVERY
Defendant:
CITY OF COATESVILLE , SHANNON MILLER , ROBERT KUECH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EADDY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2011cv00177
Plaintiff:
LESTER EADDY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, CURRAN-FROMHOLD-CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHN DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heim v. Dauphin County Prison et al
as 3:2010cv01491
Plaintiff:
Joseph Heim
Defendant:
Dauphin County Prison, Dominick L. DeRose, Elizabeth Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSSER v. PHILA. PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2010cv02799
Plaintiff:
DENNIS ROSSER
Defendant:
PHILA. PRISON SYSTEM and ARAMARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURRAY v. ALLEN et al
as 2:2010cv01014
Plaintiff:
KHALIL MURRAY
Defendant:
ALLEN , CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and ARAMARK FOOD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradshaw v. Columbia County Prison et al
as 3:2010cv00055
Plaintiff:
Bryheem Bradshaw
Defendant:
Columbia County Prison, William Campbell, Frye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
